Comprehensive Plan GMA Compliance

Share Comprehensive Plan GMA Compliance on Facebook Share Comprehensive Plan GMA Compliance on X (formerly Twitter) Share Comprehensive Plan GMA Compliance on Linkedin Email Comprehensive Plan GMA Compliance link


In 2024, the City of Mercer Island adopted a Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update, which was appealed to the Growth Management Hearings Board in 2025. The appeal resulted in a Final Decision and Order, which requires the City to update the Comprehensive Plan to comply with four requirements by July 31, 2026.



In 2024, the City of Mercer Island adopted a Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update, which was appealed to the Growth Management Hearings Board in 2025. The appeal resulted in a Final Decision and Order, which requires the City to update the Comprehensive Plan to comply with four requirements by July 31, 2026.


Have a question? Ask it here!

Email
loader image
Didn't receive confirmation?
Seems like you are already registered, please provide the password. Forgot your password? Create a new one now.
  • Share Re: Comprehensive Plan GMA Compliance, when you say, "The appeal resulted in a Final Decision and Order, which requires the City to update the Comprehensive Plan to comply with four requirements by July 31, 2026." What are the four requirements? on Facebook Share Re: Comprehensive Plan GMA Compliance, when you say, "The appeal resulted in a Final Decision and Order, which requires the City to update the Comprehensive Plan to comply with four requirements by July 31, 2026." What are the four requirements? on X (formerly Twitter) Share Re: Comprehensive Plan GMA Compliance, when you say, "The appeal resulted in a Final Decision and Order, which requires the City to update the Comprehensive Plan to comply with four requirements by July 31, 2026." What are the four requirements? on Linkedin Email Re: Comprehensive Plan GMA Compliance, when you say, "The appeal resulted in a Final Decision and Order, which requires the City to update the Comprehensive Plan to comply with four requirements by July 31, 2026." What are the four requirements? link

    Re: Comprehensive Plan GMA Compliance, when you say, "The appeal resulted in a Final Decision and Order, which requires the City to update the Comprehensive Plan to comply with four requirements by July 31, 2026." What are the four requirements?

    asked 5 days ago

    The Growth Management Hearings Board (GMHB) order requires the City to address four issues:

    1. Land Capacity Analysis: Identify residential land capacity at each housing affordability level and close any identified gaps.
    2. Adequate Provisions: Adopt incentives, mandatory provisions, and planned actions (“aka adequate provisions”) that will remove barriers to the production affordable housing.
    3. Station Area Subarea Plan: Adopt a subarea plan for the area around the transit station.
    4. Anti-Displacement Measures: Adopt anti-displacement measures to address the potential displacement that can occur with changes in zoning.

    More information about the four requirements can be read about on a previous Let’s Talk article, Understanding the Growth Management Hearings Board Order and Appeal Outcome.

  • Share What are the consequences for non-compliance? on Facebook Share What are the consequences for non-compliance? on X (formerly Twitter) Share What are the consequences for non-compliance? on Linkedin Email What are the consequences for non-compliance? link

    What are the consequences for non-compliance?

    JohnB asked 2 months ago

    The City is on track to comply with the Growth Management Hearings Board (GMHB) order by the July 31, 2026, deadline set by the GMHB Order.

    Failure to comply with the GMHB order can result in sanctions per RCW 36.70A.340. These sanctions can affect funding accrued through the sales and use tax, motor vehicle fuel tax, transportation improvement, the rural arterial trust account, the liquor profit tax, and the real estate excise tax. Overall, these sanctions would greatly affect the ability of the City to provide basic services to citizens such as road maintenance, park maintenance, fire service, police service, and more. 

  • Share Does the Station Area proposed Station Area Subarea plan include any part of Luther Burbank park? on Facebook Share Does the Station Area proposed Station Area Subarea plan include any part of Luther Burbank park? on X (formerly Twitter) Share Does the Station Area proposed Station Area Subarea plan include any part of Luther Burbank park? on Linkedin Email Does the Station Area proposed Station Area Subarea plan include any part of Luther Burbank park? link

    Does the Station Area proposed Station Area Subarea plan include any part of Luther Burbank park?

    Rosemary M asked 4 months ago

    No, the Modified Station Area Boundary approved by the City Council does not include any part of Luther Burbank Park.

    The Growth Management Act (GMA) defines the station planning area as the lots that are partially or fully located within a half-mile walking distance from light rail station entrances (RCW 36.70A.030(36)). A Modified Station Subarea Boundary may be adopted, subject to Department of Commerce approval. On January 16, 2026, the City Council approved the four guidelines for developing the Modified Station Subarea Boundary:

    Guideline 1: Exclude City parks, open space, and the Interstate 90 corridor from the half-mile walking distance area. The areas excluded by Guideline 1 are shown in green on figures 1 and 2. The area excluded by Guideline 1 includes all of Luther Burbank Park and Upper Luther Burbank Park.

    Guideline 2: Exclude additional areas that would be non-contiguous after removing city parks, open space, and the I-90 corridor.

    Guideline 3: Align the remaining walking distance area with City streets.

    Guideline 4: Follow existing zoning boundaries if City streets do not make a logical boundary.

    Per Guideline 1 above, all City parks and open space are excluded from the Modified Station Area Boundary. City Council approved the Modified Station Subarea Boundary for the purposes of GMA Compliance on March 17, 2026.

    Figure 1: Station Area Boundary Analysis (below) summarizes the step-by-step application of the guidelines as described above.

    Figure 2: Guideline 1 excludes City parks, open space, and the Interstate 90 corridor from the proposed station area.


  • Share Will there be a MFTE Map similar to what the City of Seattle uses to Highlight properties with MFTE units? on Facebook Share Will there be a MFTE Map similar to what the City of Seattle uses to Highlight properties with MFTE units? on X (formerly Twitter) Share Will there be a MFTE Map similar to what the City of Seattle uses to Highlight properties with MFTE units? on Linkedin Email Will there be a MFTE Map similar to what the City of Seattle uses to Highlight properties with MFTE units? link

    Will there be a MFTE Map similar to what the City of Seattle uses to Highlight properties with MFTE units?

    asked 4 months ago

    Thank you for the suggestion. The City of Mercer Island does not currently have regulations establishing a Multi-Family Tax Exemption (MFTE) program, nor any properties benefiting from MFTE. The implementation of MFTE will be explored in Phase 2 of the Station Area Subarea Plan as part of the City's compliance with House Bill (HB) 1491. It is possible that an MFTE map may be assembled following HB 1491 compliance.


    -Madelyn Nelson, Assistant Planner

  • Share I would like to watch the recording of the Growth Management Information Session, but when I click on the link provided in the recent email from the city my browser refuses to access the site due to security issues. I tried two different browsers and neither would allow me to proceed. Please advise. Thanks on Facebook Share I would like to watch the recording of the Growth Management Information Session, but when I click on the link provided in the recent email from the city my browser refuses to access the site due to security issues. I tried two different browsers and neither would allow me to proceed. Please advise. Thanks on X (formerly Twitter) Share I would like to watch the recording of the Growth Management Information Session, but when I click on the link provided in the recent email from the city my browser refuses to access the site due to security issues. I tried two different browsers and neither would allow me to proceed. Please advise. Thanks on Linkedin Email I would like to watch the recording of the Growth Management Information Session, but when I click on the link provided in the recent email from the city my browser refuses to access the site due to security issues. I tried two different browsers and neither would allow me to proceed. Please advise. Thanks link

    I would like to watch the recording of the Growth Management Information Session, but when I click on the link provided in the recent email from the city my browser refuses to access the site due to security issues. I tried two different browsers and neither would allow me to proceed. Please advise. Thanks

    SteveSchack asked 4 months ago

    The video can be accessed via the recent Let's Talk post Community Information Session - Recording and Slides or through the City Council Community Information Session on GMHB Order webpage.

     

    If the links continue to be blocked by the internet browser’s security system, the recording can be navigated to through the City Council webpage or can be accessed on YouTube by searching “3/10/2026 - Mercer Island - Community Information Session” posted by the Mercer Island Council account.


    -Madelyn Nelson, Assistant Planner

  • Share How common is it for cities' comprehensive plans to be ruled "not in compliance?" How many other cities were also asked to revise their plans? on Facebook Share How common is it for cities' comprehensive plans to be ruled "not in compliance?" How many other cities were also asked to revise their plans? on X (formerly Twitter) Share How common is it for cities' comprehensive plans to be ruled "not in compliance?" How many other cities were also asked to revise their plans? on Linkedin Email How common is it for cities' comprehensive plans to be ruled "not in compliance?" How many other cities were also asked to revise their plans? link

    How common is it for cities' comprehensive plans to be ruled "not in compliance?" How many other cities were also asked to revise their plans?

    elsa.bzj asked 6 months ago

    The Growth Management Hearings Board (GMHB) rules on a multitude of cases related to implementation of the Growth Management Act (GMA)--such as development, zoning, and critical area ordinancesLocal jurisdictions are required to conduct a major review and update of their comprehensive plans every 10 years, this is known as the “periodic update.” Deadlines for periodic updates are staggered (see map below), and 2024 was the deadline for the first round of comprehensive plan updates in this decade. During the 2024 comprehensive plan periodic update, cities and counties in King County, Pierce County, Snohomish County, and Kitsap County were required to review and update their comprehensive plans. Of these municipalities, there were appeals submitted to the GMHB for Clyde Hill, Kitsap County, Duvall, and Mercer Island. Mercer Island's appeal concluded first with the Final Decisions and Order issued on August 1, 2025. The other cases are still being ruled on as of January 27th, 2026. Each of the appeals during the 2024 periodic update were related, at least in part, to updates made to the GMA in 2021 via House Bill (HB) 1220 which requires cities to provide adequate provisions of housing across affordability levels.  

    Comprehensive Plan Periodic Update Map 

    Recently, Washington State Legislature enacted Senate Bill (SB) 5148known as the Housing Accountability Act, allowing the Department of Commerce to select up to 10 cities or counties a year for a targeted review for compliance with the GMA. Currently, eight cities have been selected for reviewIf the state deems a jurisdiction to be out of compliance, it will be ordered to amend its comprehensive plan to achieve compliance within 120 days 

    The updated GMA requirements from HB 1220 and the increased regulatory power from SB 5148 indicate that comprehensive plans are likely to be held to a higher level of scrutiny going forward. 

     

    -Madelyn Nelson, Assistant Planner 

Page last updated: 15 Jul 2026, 02:00 PM