Island Crest Way Corridor Improvements
Project Overview
Island Crest Way (ICW) serves an important north-south corridor through Mercer Island, providing vital connections to schools, parks, residential neighborhoods, places of worship, and commercial centers, as well as access to I-90.
In 2022, the City conducted a corridor safety analysis. This extensive study included community input which helped the City identify recommendations and solutions to address pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle safety concerns. The findings resulted in the Island Crest Way Corridor Improvements Project to enhance safety along Island Crest Way from 90th Avenue SE to SE 68th Street.
The City is now embarking on the second stage of the project where we begin the design and implementation of some of the recommendations made in the previous stage. To cover a wide range of factors and goals, this project has been broken up into several components.
Project Components
- ICW Shared Use Path Improvement Project: Assess feasibility and begin preliminary design on a shared-use path for pedestrians and cyclists. This proposed path will complete the missing section of the bicycle route along Island Crest Way between 90th Ave SE and SE 63rd St. The ICW Shared Use Path Improvement Project is the City’s current focus and will include public outreach and input from the community.
Other project components include:
- Tree Condition Assessment: Every tree along the corridor is being assessed by certified arborists to document growth conditions and ensure the preservation of healthy trees and root systems.
- Illumination Study: A corridor-wide lighting assessment to explore adequate lighting solutions and design recommendations for all roadway users.
- Crosswalk Improvements: Design of enhanced pedestrian crossings at three locations to be constructed in 2024, including Island Park Elementary School Crosswalk, SE 62nd Street & SE 63rd Street.
- Feasibility Study & Concept Design: Evaluate the feasibility of two intersection modifications: a roundabout or other improvement at the intersection of SE 68th Street and Island Crest Way and a westbound right turn lane at the intersection of SE 53rd Place and Island Crest Way.
Project Goals
- Improve safety along the Island Crest Way corridor by designing more dedicated marked crossings and enhanced lighting throughout the corridor.
- Develop a multi-modal corridor that provides safe and efficient movement for pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers.
- Provide essential connections to existing trail systems along the corridor and safe crossings to these trails.
- Encourage community members to help the City clearly identify the existing issues and explore opportunities to meet project goals.
- Improve access to transit along the corridor.
- Preserve the urban forest and the existing tree canopy while balancing safety and available right-of-way space to achieve project goals.
Get Involved
The online open house has been postponed to provide a project update and preliminary draft of shared use path alternatives to the City Council for feedback and a decision on their preferred alternative. The City Council's direction will inform the next steps of the design and public engagement process. City Council agenda bills regarding this project will be linked to Let's Talk the Thursday before the City Council meeting.
Project Overview
Island Crest Way (ICW) serves an important north-south corridor through Mercer Island, providing vital connections to schools, parks, residential neighborhoods, places of worship, and commercial centers, as well as access to I-90.
In 2022, the City conducted a corridor safety analysis. This extensive study included community input which helped the City identify recommendations and solutions to address pedestrian, bicycle, and vehicle safety concerns. The findings resulted in the Island Crest Way Corridor Improvements Project to enhance safety along Island Crest Way from 90th Avenue SE to SE 68th Street.
The City is now embarking on the second stage of the project where we begin the design and implementation of some of the recommendations made in the previous stage. To cover a wide range of factors and goals, this project has been broken up into several components.
Project Components
- ICW Shared Use Path Improvement Project: Assess feasibility and begin preliminary design on a shared-use path for pedestrians and cyclists. This proposed path will complete the missing section of the bicycle route along Island Crest Way between 90th Ave SE and SE 63rd St. The ICW Shared Use Path Improvement Project is the City’s current focus and will include public outreach and input from the community.
Other project components include:
- Tree Condition Assessment: Every tree along the corridor is being assessed by certified arborists to document growth conditions and ensure the preservation of healthy trees and root systems.
- Illumination Study: A corridor-wide lighting assessment to explore adequate lighting solutions and design recommendations for all roadway users.
- Crosswalk Improvements: Design of enhanced pedestrian crossings at three locations to be constructed in 2024, including Island Park Elementary School Crosswalk, SE 62nd Street & SE 63rd Street.
- Feasibility Study & Concept Design: Evaluate the feasibility of two intersection modifications: a roundabout or other improvement at the intersection of SE 68th Street and Island Crest Way and a westbound right turn lane at the intersection of SE 53rd Place and Island Crest Way.
Project Goals
- Improve safety along the Island Crest Way corridor by designing more dedicated marked crossings and enhanced lighting throughout the corridor.
- Develop a multi-modal corridor that provides safe and efficient movement for pedestrians, cyclists, and drivers.
- Provide essential connections to existing trail systems along the corridor and safe crossings to these trails.
- Encourage community members to help the City clearly identify the existing issues and explore opportunities to meet project goals.
- Improve access to transit along the corridor.
- Preserve the urban forest and the existing tree canopy while balancing safety and available right-of-way space to achieve project goals.
Get Involved
The online open house has been postponed to provide a project update and preliminary draft of shared use path alternatives to the City Council for feedback and a decision on their preferred alternative. The City Council's direction will inform the next steps of the design and public engagement process. City Council agenda bills regarding this project will be linked to Let's Talk the Thursday before the City Council meeting.
Ask a Question
Do you have a question related to the Island Crest Way Corridor Safety Analysis? Please submit your question here and staff will provide a response.
-
Share Just curious on the ICW crossings, there are still traffic cones up several months later. What is the holdup, or can these get picked up? on Facebook Share Just curious on the ICW crossings, there are still traffic cones up several months later. What is the holdup, or can these get picked up? on Twitter Share Just curious on the ICW crossings, there are still traffic cones up several months later. What is the holdup, or can these get picked up? on Linkedin Email Just curious on the ICW crossings, there are still traffic cones up several months later. What is the holdup, or can these get picked up? link
Just curious on the ICW crossings, there are still traffic cones up several months later. What is the holdup, or can these get picked up?
mrp asked 7 days agoThe cones at Island Park Elementary, SE 62nd Street, and SE 63rd Street are covering new pole foundations. Crews will remove the cones and install new poles on top of the foundations once electrical equipment is delivered after a lengthy manufacturing process. The City will provide updates regarding electrical installation in the Crosswalk Improvements – Construction Updates section on Let’s Talk. The estimated timeline for electrical work to occur is during school winter and mid-winter breaks to minimize impacts to traffic. Other cones on Island Crest Way, such as the cones on the east side of SE 63rd Street along the back of sidewalk, are blocking areas where crews still need to complete follow-up work. All follow-up work throughout the entire project is anticipated to occur during school spring break.
-
Share Appendix A & B have some minimal data of traffic delays on the referenced stretch of Island Crest. However it is missing some key data. Could you please provide: 1) Number of motor vehicles per day per direction on Island Crest south of SE 47th street? 2) What will is the current median drive time from the intersection of Island Crest & SE 68th St to the traffic light at SE 40th St & Island Crest? And what will be the expected median drive time for the same stretch after the addition of another pedestrian crossing and an additional traffic light as proposed? 3) The survey mentions 500 responses received during a holiday month. Can you please detail why the survey was performed during a holiday month? And why do we believe it is representative of the residents of the South End of Mercer Island with such a small sample size of responses? on Facebook Share Appendix A & B have some minimal data of traffic delays on the referenced stretch of Island Crest. However it is missing some key data. Could you please provide: 1) Number of motor vehicles per day per direction on Island Crest south of SE 47th street? 2) What will is the current median drive time from the intersection of Island Crest & SE 68th St to the traffic light at SE 40th St & Island Crest? And what will be the expected median drive time for the same stretch after the addition of another pedestrian crossing and an additional traffic light as proposed? 3) The survey mentions 500 responses received during a holiday month. Can you please detail why the survey was performed during a holiday month? And why do we believe it is representative of the residents of the South End of Mercer Island with such a small sample size of responses? on Twitter Share Appendix A & B have some minimal data of traffic delays on the referenced stretch of Island Crest. However it is missing some key data. Could you please provide: 1) Number of motor vehicles per day per direction on Island Crest south of SE 47th street? 2) What will is the current median drive time from the intersection of Island Crest & SE 68th St to the traffic light at SE 40th St & Island Crest? And what will be the expected median drive time for the same stretch after the addition of another pedestrian crossing and an additional traffic light as proposed? 3) The survey mentions 500 responses received during a holiday month. Can you please detail why the survey was performed during a holiday month? And why do we believe it is representative of the residents of the South End of Mercer Island with such a small sample size of responses? on Linkedin Email Appendix A & B have some minimal data of traffic delays on the referenced stretch of Island Crest. However it is missing some key data. Could you please provide: 1) Number of motor vehicles per day per direction on Island Crest south of SE 47th street? 2) What will is the current median drive time from the intersection of Island Crest & SE 68th St to the traffic light at SE 40th St & Island Crest? And what will be the expected median drive time for the same stretch after the addition of another pedestrian crossing and an additional traffic light as proposed? 3) The survey mentions 500 responses received during a holiday month. Can you please detail why the survey was performed during a holiday month? And why do we believe it is representative of the residents of the South End of Mercer Island with such a small sample size of responses? link
Appendix A & B have some minimal data of traffic delays on the referenced stretch of Island Crest. However it is missing some key data. Could you please provide: 1) Number of motor vehicles per day per direction on Island Crest south of SE 47th street? 2) What will is the current median drive time from the intersection of Island Crest & SE 68th St to the traffic light at SE 40th St & Island Crest? And what will be the expected median drive time for the same stretch after the addition of another pedestrian crossing and an additional traffic light as proposed? 3) The survey mentions 500 responses received during a holiday month. Can you please detail why the survey was performed during a holiday month? And why do we believe it is representative of the residents of the South End of Mercer Island with such a small sample size of responses?
aj@ asked 4 months ago1) Number of motor vehicles per day per direction on Island Crest south of SE 47th Street?
Response: According to the Safety Analysis, the combined northbound and southbound average daily traffic is approximately 15,000 to 16,000 vehicles per day.
2) What will is the current median drive time from the intersection of Island Crest & SE 68th St to the traffic light at SE 40th St & Island Crest? And what will be the expected median drive time for the same stretch after the addition of another pedestrian crossing and an additional traffic light as proposed?
Response: Estimating drive time was not part of the safety study.
3) The survey mentions 500 responses received during a holiday month. Can you please detail why the survey was performed during a holiday month? And why do we believe it is representative of the residents of the South End of Mercer Island with such a small sample size of responses?
Response: The Safety Study was added to the City’s Six-Year Transportation Improvement Program (TIP) in early summer 2021 with the intent to proceed with the study that year and present the results to the City Council in Q1 2022 ahead of updating the TIP in Q2 to include safety improvements on Island Crest Way. The short time frame for the study and the necessary steps leading up to the survey resulted in the survey occurring during the month of December. We took steps to promote it widely to increase awareness of the survey and allow time for responses. The online survey was open for one month between December 2 and January 3. It was advertised through the City’s communications channels including Let’s Talk, social media channels, signage along Island Crest Way and direct communications with area schools to reach teachers, students, and parents. The intent was to receive feedback from those with interest in the Island Crest Way corridor and potential projects including a variety of users of Island Crest Way, area residents, students and parents, commuters, etc. We received 499 responses from a variety of users of Island Crest Way.
-
Share Will a traffic light be installed at the intersection of 53rd and Island Crest Way to help traffic flow east and west during school day start and finish hours? on Facebook Share Will a traffic light be installed at the intersection of 53rd and Island Crest Way to help traffic flow east and west during school day start and finish hours? on Twitter Share Will a traffic light be installed at the intersection of 53rd and Island Crest Way to help traffic flow east and west during school day start and finish hours? on Linkedin Email Will a traffic light be installed at the intersection of 53rd and Island Crest Way to help traffic flow east and west during school day start and finish hours? link
Will a traffic light be installed at the intersection of 53rd and Island Crest Way to help traffic flow east and west during school day start and finish hours?
Ktohill asked 6 months agoNo, not at this time. This intersection does not meet the required Federal standards to allow installation of a traffic signal. However, we are aware of long delays for westbound vehicles on SE 53rd Pl. approaching Island Crest Way during the morning and afternoon peak travel times. The congestion on Island Crest Way leaves limited gaps in traffic for vehicles to enter from SE 53rd Pl. The delay on SE 53rd Pl. is caused in part from there being only one lane approaching Island Crest Way for vehicles whether traveling straight or turning left/right.
The majority of vehicles turn right at this intersection which means that left turning vehicles increase delays for right turning vehicles behind them. This can create frustration and potential for drivers to rush to make turns into small gaps in traffic without paying attention to pedestrians. The proposed intersection improvement will add a westbound to northbound right turn lane on SE 53rd Pl. to give right turning vehicles a dedicated lane as shown in the photo simulation below.
-
Share Is the "pedestrian signal" referenced above a stop light or a modification to the existing pedestrian beacons at Island Park Elementary and Island Crest Park? Why/how was it determined that the existing beacons were insufficient? on Facebook Share Is the "pedestrian signal" referenced above a stop light or a modification to the existing pedestrian beacons at Island Park Elementary and Island Crest Park? Why/how was it determined that the existing beacons were insufficient? on Twitter Share Is the "pedestrian signal" referenced above a stop light or a modification to the existing pedestrian beacons at Island Park Elementary and Island Crest Park? Why/how was it determined that the existing beacons were insufficient? on Linkedin Email Is the "pedestrian signal" referenced above a stop light or a modification to the existing pedestrian beacons at Island Park Elementary and Island Crest Park? Why/how was it determined that the existing beacons were insufficient? link
Is the "pedestrian signal" referenced above a stop light or a modification to the existing pedestrian beacons at Island Park Elementary and Island Crest Park? Why/how was it determined that the existing beacons were insufficient?
aj@ asked 4 months agoThe new pedestrian signal will have a red, yellow, and green light similar to the pedestrian signal at SE 32nd Street and Island Crest Way. Similar to a traffic signal, it is programmed on a cycle to be green for a minimum timeframe to reduce traffic delays. The light will turn red and stop traffic after the push button is pressed. When the push button is pressed during the minimum green cycle timeframe, it will turn red only after the cycle is complete. This improves traffic flow by controlling the frequency of pedestrian crossings. The existing rectangular rapid flashing beacon (RRFB) helped provide warning to motorists of pedestrians on or near the roadway, but it did not reduce motor vehicle delay during heavy pedestrian times of the day (such as school start and end times) since the lights would flash and stop traffic as soon as the button was pushed. Northbound and southbound traffic often backs up near the school as drivers wait for crossing pedestrians at the existing RRFB. The Island Crest Way Corridor Safety Analysis identified the new pedestrian signal as a way to improve pedestrian safety and reduce vehicle delay.
-
Share What is the cost of the feasibility study of a roundabout at SE 68th Street? Why is a roundabout being considered? What is the problem that needs to be solved? on Facebook Share What is the cost of the feasibility study of a roundabout at SE 68th Street? Why is a roundabout being considered? What is the problem that needs to be solved? on Twitter Share What is the cost of the feasibility study of a roundabout at SE 68th Street? Why is a roundabout being considered? What is the problem that needs to be solved? on Linkedin Email What is the cost of the feasibility study of a roundabout at SE 68th Street? Why is a roundabout being considered? What is the problem that needs to be solved? link
What is the cost of the feasibility study of a roundabout at SE 68th Street? Why is a roundabout being considered? What is the problem that needs to be solved?
MLL asked 5 months agoThe intersection feasibility study is one of several tasks in the Island Crest Way Corridor Improvements (SP0135) project and includes analysis and preliminary design of safety improvements at the SE 53rd Place and SE 68th Street intersections with Island Crest Way. The SE 68th Street analysis evaluates intersection treatments to alleviate intersection congestion and provide pedestrian/bicycle safety for park and trail users. A roundabout and other safety improvements are being considered as part of this evaluation, as outlined by the Island Crest Way Corridor Safety Analysis to reduce collisions, improve traffic operations, and improve pedestrian and bicycle safety. The initial focus will be on safety improvements for pedestrians and bicyclists that do not require construction of a roundabout. The details of the intersection feasibility study will be completed this fall and will be made available on Let’s Talk.
Other tasks of Island Crest Way Corridor Improvements include the design and construction of three crosswalk improvement this summer ($1,567,469), corridor tree and illumination assessments, and shared use path study and preliminary design. The total 2023-2024 budget for Island Crest Way Corridor Improvements is $2,123,156.
-
Share What is the actual safety question for the right turn at 53rd and island crest? I commonly turned left Northward from 88th Ave., Southeast onto Island crest Way. When driving and walking I commonly see people going to fast around that corner if the concern at 53rd and island crest Way is traffic approaching from the northbound lane, does it really need a right turn lane? Good better speed control accomplish the same task at less cost and disruption of traffic during the construction phase? And less cost? on Facebook Share What is the actual safety question for the right turn at 53rd and island crest? I commonly turned left Northward from 88th Ave., Southeast onto Island crest Way. When driving and walking I commonly see people going to fast around that corner if the concern at 53rd and island crest Way is traffic approaching from the northbound lane, does it really need a right turn lane? Good better speed control accomplish the same task at less cost and disruption of traffic during the construction phase? And less cost? on Twitter Share What is the actual safety question for the right turn at 53rd and island crest? I commonly turned left Northward from 88th Ave., Southeast onto Island crest Way. When driving and walking I commonly see people going to fast around that corner if the concern at 53rd and island crest Way is traffic approaching from the northbound lane, does it really need a right turn lane? Good better speed control accomplish the same task at less cost and disruption of traffic during the construction phase? And less cost? on Linkedin Email What is the actual safety question for the right turn at 53rd and island crest? I commonly turned left Northward from 88th Ave., Southeast onto Island crest Way. When driving and walking I commonly see people going to fast around that corner if the concern at 53rd and island crest Way is traffic approaching from the northbound lane, does it really need a right turn lane? Good better speed control accomplish the same task at less cost and disruption of traffic during the construction phase? And less cost? link
What is the actual safety question for the right turn at 53rd and island crest? I commonly turned left Northward from 88th Ave., Southeast onto Island crest Way. When driving and walking I commonly see people going to fast around that corner if the concern at 53rd and island crest Way is traffic approaching from the northbound lane, does it really need a right turn lane? Good better speed control accomplish the same task at less cost and disruption of traffic during the construction phase? And less cost?
John Rieke asked 8 months agoThank you for your question. There are long delays for westbound vehicles on SE 53rd Pl. approaching Island Crest Way during the morning and afternoon peak travel times. The congestion on Island Crest Way leaves limited gaps in traffic for vehicles to enter from SE 53rd Pl.
The delay on SE 53rd Pl. is caused in part from there being only one lane approaching Island Crest way for vehicles whether traveling straight or turning left/right.
The majority of vehicles turn right at this intersection which means that left turning vehicles increase delays for right turning vehicles behind them. This can create frustration and potential for drivers to rush, as you mentioned, to make turns into small gaps in traffic without paying attention to pedestrians.
The proposed intersection improvement will add a westbound to northbound right turn lane on SE 53rd Pl. to give right turning vehicles a dedicated lane as shown in the photo simulation below.
-
Share I see stakes in the ground put up recently at the vacant city-owned lot at the SE corner of SE 40th and Island Crest Way (4004 ICW). What is going on there? Adding a right turn lane? on Facebook Share I see stakes in the ground put up recently at the vacant city-owned lot at the SE corner of SE 40th and Island Crest Way (4004 ICW). What is going on there? Adding a right turn lane? on Twitter Share I see stakes in the ground put up recently at the vacant city-owned lot at the SE corner of SE 40th and Island Crest Way (4004 ICW). What is going on there? Adding a right turn lane? on Linkedin Email I see stakes in the ground put up recently at the vacant city-owned lot at the SE corner of SE 40th and Island Crest Way (4004 ICW). What is going on there? Adding a right turn lane? link
I see stakes in the ground put up recently at the vacant city-owned lot at the SE corner of SE 40th and Island Crest Way (4004 ICW). What is going on there? Adding a right turn lane?
Michael Friedman asked about 1 year agoThank you for contacting the City. The work at 4004 Island Crest Way is a different project. Construction is scheduled to begin there this week. The property was acquired recently by the City for future transportation needs and current improvements include some new sidewalk along the Island Crest Way frontage, pedestrian access into the lot, and new landscaping. The project should be completed by mid-December.
Project Phases
-
Project Kick-Off
Island Crest Way Corridor Improvements has finished this stage- Finalize Project Timeline & Scope with Consultant
- Develop Community Stakeholder Input Process
-
Preliminary Design Development
Island Crest Way Corridor Improvements has finished this stage- Develop preliminary design alternatives.
-
Shared Use Path Preliminary Draft Alternatives
Island Crest Way Corridor Improvements has finished this stage- City Council Meeting: On March 19, 2024, the City Council will receive a project update and discuss alternatives. No decisions on the path alternatives will be made at this meeting.
- Agenda bill (AB6421) Island Crest Way Corridor Improvements Project Update
- Shared Use Path Conceptual Design Summary Memo (exhibit 1 of AB6421)
- City staff will present information to the City Council in response to their questions and requests about the shared use path alternatives. and present a recommended shared use path alignment.
- City Council Meeting: On March 19, 2024, the City Council will receive a project update and discuss alternatives. No decisions on the path alternatives will be made at this meeting.
-
Present Refined Alternatives
Island Crest Way Corridor Improvements has finished this stage- City staff will present a recommended shared use path alignment for City Council consideration and inclusion in the 2025-2030 Transportation Improvement Program.
-
Design Process
Island Crest Way Corridor Improvements is currently at this stage- Shared Use Path Phase 1 (school to SE 60th Street) design and public engagement
- SE 53rd Place intersection safety improvements and the SE 68th Street pedestrian/bicycle safety improvements.
Key Dates
-
March 19 2024
FAQs
- What is the difference between a Rectangular Rapid-Flashing Beacon (RRFB) and Pedestrian Signal?
- What is happening at SE 62nd Street and SE 63rd Street?
- What is going to happen at the Island Park Elementary School Crosswalk?
- What short-term improvements has the City implemented to address safety needs along the ICW corridor?
- What are you doing to preserve the trees along Island Crest Way?
Documents
- ICW project awareness 24-14 sign.pdf (1.16 MB) (pdf)
- AB6421
- AB6421 Slide Deck Presentation.pdf (6.14 MB) (pdf)
- AB6503
- AB6503 Slide Deck Presentation
- Proposed Project Phasing June 18, 2024.pdf (276 KB) (pdf)
- 2025-2030 Transportation Improvement Program adopted June 18, 2024.pdf (648 KB) (pdf)
- Final Illumination Study Memo.pdf (7.26 MB) (pdf)
- Final Intersection Feasibility Design Report.pdf (5.34 MB) (pdf)
- Final Shared Use Path PreDesign Report.pdf (11.6 MB) (pdf)
- Final Tree Assessment Memo.pdf (5.91 MB) (pdf)
Who's Listening
-
City Engineer / PW Deputy Director
-
Phone 206-572-5032 Email rebecca.osullivan@mercerisland.gov
Thank you for your contribution!
Help us reach out to more people in the community
Share this with family and friends