Mercer Island Transit Interchange

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

The Mercer Island Transit Interchange is the integration of bus transit service from the Eastside with East Link light rail. When East Link opens for service in 2023, some bus routes from the Eastside to Seattle will terminate at Mercer Island Station, where passengers will transfer to/from light rail.

Learn more by reading the articles below, as well as the FAQs and studying the Document Library; use the tools below to Ask a Question or Post a Comment. [Note: FAQ's not updated after Oct 2020]

The Mercer Island Transit Interchange is the integration of bus transit service from the Eastside with East Link light rail. When East Link opens for service in 2023, some bus routes from the Eastside to Seattle will terminate at Mercer Island Station, where passengers will transfer to/from light rail.

Learn more by reading the articles below, as well as the FAQs and studying the Document Library; use the tools below to Ask a Question or Post a Comment. [Note: FAQ's not updated after Oct 2020]

  • An Update on Sound Transit’s Motion for Summary Judgment

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

    As previously noted, the King County Superior Court last Friday granted Sound Transit’s motion for summary judgment. At the hearing, the Court provided an oral ruling, which it entered as an order this week. The order is available for review, with the transcript of the hearing attached (the Court’s oral ruling begins on page 35 of the transcript). The City invites its residents interested in the decision to review it carefully.

    The City respectfully disagrees with the Court’s order. For example, the Court held that the City had no right to file a lawsuit, which in the City’s view would impermissibly render the Settlement Agreement unenforceable and was not supported by the facts before the Court. Additionally, the Court held that the conditions the City imposed on Sound Transit’s permit applications (ones that required Sound Transit to respect the conditions to which it agreed in the Settlement Agreement) constituted impermissible “additional mitigation.” This too was contrary to the law and the evidence before the Court.

    Contrary to information that has been circulating, the Court did not rule that former City staff agreed to Sound Transit and Metro’s demands for changes to the Settlement Agreement.

    The City and Sound Transit struck a deal four years ago. Since then Sound Transit has acted (and argued in court) that it does not need to follow that deal. The City strongly disagrees and continues to evaluate its options going forward.

  • An Update on the City’s Motion for Preliminary Injunction

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

    This morning the King County Superior Court held a hearing on the City’s motion for a preliminary injunction and Sound Transit’s motion for partial summary judgment. In a ruling during the hearing, the Court denied the City’s motion, which sought to enjoin construction of a curb cut on the north side of North Mercer Way for bus layovers. The Court substantially granted Sound Transit’s motion for summary judgment as well. Sound Transit’s motion pertained to many, but not all issues in dispute between the parties.

    The City respectfully disagrees with the Court’s decision and is evaluating all of its options. The City expects to post the Court’s written orders to the City’s Let’s Talk page when those orders are entered by the Court.

    UPDATE | 12/22/2021: The Court issued an order granting Sound Transit's motion for summary judgement, denying the City's motion for preliminary injunction.



  • An Update on the Mercer Island Transit Interchange Litigation

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link

    Last week, the City of Mercer Island sought narrowly-tailored relief from the King County Superior Court. The City seeks an order prohibiting Sound Transit from constructing a curb cut on the north side of North Mercer Way as a part of the construction of the Mercer Island Transit Interchange. The curb cut is in violation of the 2017 Settlement Agreement between the City and Sound Transit, and Sound Transit admits the curb cut will be used for purposes that the Settlement Agreement prohibits. Sound Transit has proceeded with plans for construction in violation of its obligations under the Settlement Agreement. The City believes it is important that the parties’ disputes over the Settlement Agreement be resolved before the City’s streets are altered in ways the Settlement Agreement does not authorize.

    Because the City supports both East Link and the Mercer Island Transit Interchange, the order the City seeks is very narrow. It would allow Sound Transit to proceed with the vast majority of the project, prohibiting only the disputed curb cut until the parties can each have their day in court on the Settlement Agreement dispute - the City is confident in its legal position. The Court will consider the City’s request at a hearing on December 17, 2021.

    The City has also learned that Sound Transit has filed a motion for summary judgment and is asking the court to say that it has complied fully with the Settlement Agreement and that the City is in violation of the agreement.

    In the years since the Settlement Agreement was approved, Sound Transit repeatedly ignored the City’s rights under that agreement and failed to meet its own obligations under that agreement. Instead of engaging in good faith with the City, it has moved forward without regard for the agreement it reached, rejecting the City’s many attempts to work cooperatively with Sound Transit to find a mutually acceptable resolution.

    The City of Mercer Island fully rejects Sound Transit’s arguments and will oppose its motion for summary judgment.

    Full court filings and background on the Mercer Island Transit Interchange can be found on Let’s Talk.

  • An Update on Sound Transit's Land Use Petition Act Appeal

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    supporting image

    Earlier today, the Superior Court issued an order granting Sound Transit’s Motion to Strike the City’s Notice of Supersedeas. This means there is no stay in place of the Court’s earlier order in the Land Use Petition Act appeal directing the City to issue Sound Transit permits to construct bus layovers on the north side of North Mercer Way. Consequently, the disputed permit has been issued to Sound Transit in compliance with the Court’s order.

    Fortunately, the Court’s decision is not a ruling based on the terms of the Settlement Agreement or the remedies that it may later provide. The City will continue to litigate its 2020 lawsuit against Sound Transit for breach of the Settlement Agreement which is unimpacted by today’s decision.

  • An Update on the City's Lawsuit with Sound Transit

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    supporting image



    On Friday, September 3, King County Superior Court issued an order in the City’s 2020 Settlement Agreement Lawsuit with Sound Transit clarifying and confirming that the costs awarded to the City for Sound Transit’s discovery misconduct include expenses incurred by the City to review Sound Transit’s document dump. The clarification and confirmation was sought by Sound Transit. The City will be recovering $58,985.05 from Sound Transit.


  • An Update on Sound Transit’s Land Use Petition Act Appeal

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    supporting image


    Earlier today, the City filed a Notice of Appeal to the Court of Appeals, and a Notice of Supersedeas Without Bond, which stayed the Superior Court’s decision to allow construction of a Sound Transit’s bus layover on the north side of North Mercer Way. These were filed after carefully evaluating all options in response to the decision from the Superior Court denying the City’s motion to dismiss Sound Transit’s Land Use Petition Act appeal and granting Sound Transit’s motion for Summary Judgment. More information on the appeal and stay will be forthcoming.


  • An Update on Sound Transit’s Land Use Petition Act Appeal

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    supporting image

    Last June, Sound Transit filed a Land Use Petition Act (LUPA) appeal in Superior Court challenging the Hearing Examiner’s decision on permits related to construction of their bus-rail integration facilities on North Mercer Way. This appeal is separate and distinct from the City’s 2020 lawsuit against Sound Transit for breach of the 2017 Settlement Agreement. The Court held a hearing on Friday, August 20 to consider a motion filed by the City to dismiss the LUPA appeal and a motion filed by Sound Transit for partial summary judgment.

    Unfortunately, the Court denied the City’s motion to dismiss and granted Sound Transit’s motion for partial summary judgment to construct a bus layover bay on the north side of North Mercer Way. In granting Sound Transit’s motion, the Court opined that the terms of the mutually agreed upon Settlement Agreement could not be the basis to condition Sound Transit’s permit, even if the resulting permit violates the parties’ Settlement Agreement.

    The Court, however, made it explicit that it was not ruling on the terms of the Settlement Agreement or the remedies that it may later provide to either party. This leaves all options open for the City to continue to litigate its 2020 lawsuit against Sound Transit for breach of the Settlement Agreement unimpacted by today’s ruling.

    The City is currently evaluating all of its options for responding to Friday's decision. A written order/decision of the rulings was issued by the Court on August 25 and can be viewed here.

  • An Update on the City’s Lawsuit Against Sound Transit

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    supporting image

    As part of the City’s lawsuit against Sound Transit, the City was forced to seek relief from the Court due to Sound Transit’s discovery misconduct and pattern of delays. The City requested this relief after Sound Transit significantly delayed producing documents and dumped more than 100,000 unreviewed documents on the City, requiring the City to expend considerable time and resources sorting through a large number of irrelevant documents. The Court granted the City’s motion in full and ordered Sound Transit to produce all documents requested by the City within a month. The Court likewise ordered Sound Transit to reimburse the City for fees and costs relating to Sound Transit’s misconduct. The City is pleased that the Court granted its motion and looks forward to finally receiving all requested documents so that the City can pursue its claims.

  • An Update on Sound Transit's Appeal to Hearing Examiner

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    supporting image

    July 29, 2021 - On August 20th, the Court will hear motions from the City and Sound Transit as part of Sound Transit’s litigation to appeal the Mercer Island Transit Interchange permits. The City is asking the Court to dismiss the issues involving City rights-of-way and the 2017 Settlement Agreement disputes from Sound Transit’s Land Use Petition Act appeal. These issues are already properly before the Court in the litigation filed by the City in October of 2020. Sound Transit’s motion asks the Court to bypass the October 2020 case, ignore the 2017 Settlement Agreement between the City and Sound Transit, and require permits be issued that violate the terms of the 2017 Settlement Agreement.

    Meanwhile, in the 2020 case the City is pursuing to enforce the plain terms of the Settlement Agreement, the parties are proceeding in discovery. The City has been working to address Sound Transit’s failure to properly produce documents in response to the City’s requests. Although the City has begun depositions, Sound Transit’s actions have delayed this work. In light of delays related to Sound Transit’s production of documents, the Court has agreed that the trial date should be moved to Spring of 2022. The City anticipates seeking further relief from the Court related to these issues as appropriate. The City continues its work to prepare its case for trial.

  • An Update on Sound Transit's Appeal to Hearing Examiner

    Share on Facebook Share on Twitter Share on Linkedin Email this link
    supporting image

    June 10, 2021 – Sound Transit filed litigation in King County Superior Court on June 9, 2021, appealing the Hearing Examiner’s decision regarding permits for the Mercer Island Transit Interchange. Sound Transit’s claims focus on decisions the Hearing Examiner made to defer to the courts regarding interpretation of the 2017 Settlement Agreement between Sound Transit and the City. In this new case, Sound Transit is asking the Court to order permits be issued for a new bus layover on the north side of North Mercer Way before the litigation regarding the 2017 Settlement Agreement is resolved. The City will vigorously defend its position in this new appeal as well as continue forward with its October 2020 case filed to have the terms of the 2017 Settlement Agreement enforced.

Page last updated: 13 January 2022, 10:56